Piranha Editing for Ending

I brought my latest short story to this year’s Tin House Summer Workshop hoping for an ending.

I had no intention of writing another scene. The characters were going to have to work it out within the bounds of the current version. I had four scenes. A luxury, really, but I just couldn’t break open the main character so she’d take the bait, like the guy, and freak-out at the end. This was the map I wanted to draw.

Everything I threw at these characters was thrown back at me.

  1. White hot story pacing
  2. Character banter like battle armor
  3. Insecurity traps and mind games
  4. A robbery

After the workshop, the first thing I did was tighten the noose with setting descriptions. This slowed down the dialogue, built a little more tension and helped anchor the reader in the last scene. I couldn’t figure out plot, but I knew they got out of a car and walked so I described that in detail. At least I was fixing something, even if I didn’t know what was supposed to happen at the end.

The main character still wouldn’t break, but the workshop had validated my hunch on where she would break in the banter. I tested those spots after each round of edits. Nothing. 

A friend from the workshop reread the draft and suggested that I should draw out the first scene (do more show than tell). This helped set the trap and open up some opportunities. I also spun in some quirks and mind games. Threading them through the story helped me to bust up the banter to show some character vulnerability. 

When the character finally broke, I touched up the ending and deleted a lot of the new stuff to get back to the bones of the story. The whole process reminded me of Piranha.

How do you write about a good kiss?

Anxiety writes novels. A good kiss can barely spell.

We use words to feel grounded so we have many ways to describe misery and suffering. Words help us to comprehend and delimit the thoughts which surround and outnumber the emotions we are trying to accept.  

The opposite is true for a good kiss. Thoughts escape. Emotions expand to fill the space.

When I challenged myself to write about a good kiss, I had to search through each of the five senses for clues to rebuild the moment.

Sophie Cabot Black got closer than I did with her poem, Interrogation, which is about more than a kiss.

Complexity can limit access to the reader’s imagination

Our goal is to bring the reader into the story, not to confuse them. Readers need stability. Writers have concrete details. Then, things get a little crazy when we start to write.

For example, how would a writer move the reader through this scene from Roma, a film by Frederico Fellini, while retaining pace and energy?

Dialogue, observations, thoughts, and actions can be the source of order or unpredictability as we seek to recreate the scene. Tension can be created, but we need to manage it using all the tricks of craft.

As writers, our budget for special effects is unbounded, but our ability to handle complexity limits our access to the reader’s imagination. Film directors have their boundaries. We have ours.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes